113
113
Oct 11, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 113
favorite 0
quote 0
i hear all this talk about about the death tax, the estate tax. it's going give a windfall to the people. all themen money going the privilege people who built the pis business, made their money it's their money. which is it? do we have a country built on equal natural rights, where you can make the most of your life, get up, work hard, take risks, become successful, create jobs, grow businesses, do well, earn success, and yes, pass it on to your kids. what on earth is wrong with that? that's the american dream. and to my friend to my side of the aisle who simply don't like some of the spending in the bill. i don't like it either. let's cut the spending next year when we're in charge. there's junk in the tax code. everybody agrees with this. this is advancing some of the junk in the tax code and what i say to my friends on the other side of the aisle next year let's get rid of the junk of the tax code with we're in charge. right now, let's not hit the american people with the tax increase. if we want to get this debt under control, if we want to g
i hear all this talk about about the death tax, the estate tax. it's going give a windfall to the people. all themen money going the privilege people who built the pis business, made their money it's their money. which is it? do we have a country built on equal natural rights, where you can make the most of your life, get up, work hard, take risks, become successful, create jobs, grow businesses, do well, earn success, and yes, pass it on to your kids. what on earth is wrong with that? that's...
66
66
Oct 12, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 66
favorite 0
quote 0
stage, that tax cut's a 20% across the board plus the estate tax, is $5 trillion. $5 trillion. there's no question, you can't argue about it, that if you look at all of the deductions and all the exemptions, assuming you got rid of every penny of the chapterble deduction and the standard deduction for people with incomes over $250,000, there's much less than $5 trillion there. you're talking about giving a tax cut to people over $250,000, even if you take away every single deduction and loophole. it's very hard to understand how you can talk about doing that and not giving any tax to wealthy people. if you are going to pay for your $5 trillion tax cut, since you can't pay for your $5 trillion tax cut by taking it from people with income above $250,000, it follows -- it follows that you have to take it from people with incomes under $250,000 who, in the political process, we have come to call the middle class and the upper middle class. that is elementary math. now, it is suggested that that's just one study by the tax policy center, and that there are somehow six contrary studi
stage, that tax cut's a 20% across the board plus the estate tax, is $5 trillion. $5 trillion. there's no question, you can't argue about it, that if you look at all of the deductions and all the exemptions, assuming you got rid of every penny of the chapterble deduction and the standard deduction for people with incomes over $250,000, there's much less than $5 trillion there. you're talking about giving a tax cut to people over $250,000, even if you take away every single deduction and...
118
118
Oct 10, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 118
favorite 0
quote 0
additional tax cuts to middle-class families, tax cuts for healthcare, tax cuts to help families pay for their college tuition, tax cuts for childcare. these families are struggling and hurting and they need more tax relief, not less tax relief. but to help get us on the path to a balanced budget, we want to get rid of some of the bureaucratic spending in washington. they've actually layered on more supervisory people, people at the supervisory level in this government. we also want to close some corporate loopholes. i want to be honest with people. we can't eliminate this deficit. people have heard that over and over and over in four years. we cannot do it. we're in too deep a hole. but we can cut the deficit in half and move this country back on a path to fiscal responsibility >> 90 seconds, mr. vice president. >> the kerry record on taxes is one basically of voting for a large number of tax increases, 98 times in the united states senate. there's a fundamental philosophical difference here between the president and myself, who believe we ought to let the american people keep more
additional tax cuts to middle-class families, tax cuts for healthcare, tax cuts to help families pay for their college tuition, tax cuts for childcare. these families are struggling and hurting and they need more tax relief, not less tax relief. but to help get us on the path to a balanced budget, we want to get rid of some of the bureaucratic spending in washington. they've actually layered on more supervisory people, people at the supervisory level in this government. we also want to close...
75
75
Oct 11, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
raising taxes, raising taxes is not the answer. if you think about it washington, you should not want anybody to send my more money to washington until they learn fix what they spend today. if i held up a budget and put the holes and the leaks and the spending that's going on. you would say why would anybody want to put more water in the bucket. let's fix it. that's the difference. washington doesn't know how to spend the money they're getting already. we need make sure we are looking at every line item. we are borrowing 40 cents on the dollar for every thing we spend we need to make sure is it worth borrowing money from chinese to do this. >> moderator: a followup question, i'm start with you mr. renacci. how kickly -- quickly shouldly reached balance spended you supported the ryan budget which takes twenty five years to reach the goal. is that realistic or should it be shorter? renacci: i'm concerned that making social security, medicare, and medicaid are solvent. i want to make sure that those 55 and older have no changes to the
raising taxes, raising taxes is not the answer. if you think about it washington, you should not want anybody to send my more money to washington until they learn fix what they spend today. if i held up a budget and put the holes and the leaks and the spending that's going on. you would say why would anybody want to put more water in the bucket. let's fix it. that's the difference. washington doesn't know how to spend the money they're getting already. we need make sure we are looking at every...
153
153
Oct 10, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 153
favorite 0
quote 0
taxes or not support a tax reduction. 94 times. now, that's not what we need to create jobs and really bolster and heat up our economy. we do need the private sector to be able to keep more of what we earn and produce. government's going to have to learn to be more efficient and live with less if that's what it takes to rein in the government growth that we've seen today. but we do need tax relief, and barack obama even supported increasing taxes as late as last year for those families making only $42,000 a year. that's a lot of middle income, average american families, to increase taxes on them? i think that is a way to kill jobs and continue to harm our economy. >> moderator: senator? biden: charge is absolutely not true. barack obama did not vote to raise taxes. the vote she's referring to, john mccain voted the exact same way. it was a budget procedural vote. john mccain voted the same way, it did not raise taxes. number two, using the standard that the governor uses, john mccain voted 477 times to raise taxes. it's a bogus sta
taxes or not support a tax reduction. 94 times. now, that's not what we need to create jobs and really bolster and heat up our economy. we do need the private sector to be able to keep more of what we earn and produce. government's going to have to learn to be more efficient and live with less if that's what it takes to rein in the government growth that we've seen today. but we do need tax relief, and barack obama even supported increasing taxes as late as last year for those families making...
111
111
Oct 11, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 111
favorite 0
quote 0
because of that tax reform, and they are keeping the tax money there. to help the poor will have a commitment to the program and they're spending more in poverty programs today than we were in 1981. that is a fact. the poverty program that we are going to concentrate on is creating jobs and opportunities so that everyone will have the opportunity that they want. >> moderator: senator bentsen, your response? bentsen: i find that very interesting, because he has been of no help at all when it comes to passing the most major wall family for bill in the history of the country. we are working very hard to see that people can get off of welfare, break that cycle, take a step up doing the kind things we did there to let them have medicaid for the year that is a positive thing that it's done. but also frustrates me with a kind of reports that i just heard here is the kind of vote that he has cast against the child nutrition programs. the fact that he's voted against money that we needed for the further immunizations, the denial of polio shots to kids where the
because of that tax reform, and they are keeping the tax money there. to help the poor will have a commitment to the program and they're spending more in poverty programs today than we were in 1981. that is a fact. the poverty program that we are going to concentrate on is creating jobs and opportunities so that everyone will have the opportunity that they want. >> moderator: senator bentsen, your response? bentsen: i find that very interesting, because he has been of no help at all when...
99
99
Oct 8, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 99
favorite 0
quote 0
the country pays no taxes. pacino talk about that. >> guest: the reason they pay the taxes at the same reason they rob eggs. as where the money is. >> host: what do you mean? >> guest: the reach of all the money now. they have always paid my taxes. you don't think it's his or harder working, more virtuous in terms of putting themselves on the line and accept risk in order to achieve their trains? >> guest: some fall into that category. the world is filled with all kinds of creative people who need a lot of money. and there's no problem. the problem we say is that this is a ballot the way it used to be for the rich didn't use to pay a lot more than they do now. the average person i has no idea. how much the tax rates have dropped. i mean, the one you mentioned a second ago as dividend income. it's a perfect example. most of its history, the tax on dividends was outpaced what was it to it was the biochemistry salesman or die maker, whatever. the end of your income, dividends were taxed at that rate. 2000 the cubs
the country pays no taxes. pacino talk about that. >> guest: the reason they pay the taxes at the same reason they rob eggs. as where the money is. >> host: what do you mean? >> guest: the reach of all the money now. they have always paid my taxes. you don't think it's his or harder working, more virtuous in terms of putting themselves on the line and accept risk in order to achieve their trains? >> guest: some fall into that category. the world is filled with all kinds...
114
114
Oct 9, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 114
favorite 0
quote 0
the government can deny you tax-exempt status. even though it does involve your religious beliefs because there are some rules for the civil society and secular society and we are found on the principle that we get to have a organized non-chaotic government even if it does infringe on the religious belief as long as we are not targetting a religion a lot of what is going on with this birth control argument that the churches are wanting from the government have constitutional implications and with that i'm going to turn over to charlie who knows about that much more than i do. [applause] i don't know a darn thing about law. [applause] i and addressing this issue of women's economic rights to the right of contraceptive health care coverage in the light of the demands of religious liberty. so, some of the things we've talked about. in my judgment it's been understood in this country has been pointed out it's important but it can conflict with other rights. so therefore i also distinguish between religious liberty and the very strict
the government can deny you tax-exempt status. even though it does involve your religious beliefs because there are some rules for the civil society and secular society and we are found on the principle that we get to have a organized non-chaotic government even if it does infringe on the religious belief as long as we are not targetting a religion a lot of what is going on with this birth control argument that the churches are wanting from the government have constitutional implications and...
89
89
Oct 9, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
why i see that as not really much -- >> might taxes pay for an awful lot of things that i opposed. [applause] >> just to be clear, the position is that the institution's money does not go toward the care that they object to, so that is why i see it as an appropriate or a well intentioned and well functioning agreement. the money goes from women's pockets to the insurance that they are part of. while there may be other folks who are a part of the same insurance plans to disagree, that happens a lot of ways. i may disagree with someone else's health care choices. i'm sure there are folks on insurance plans to double even blood transfusions, but part of being part of an insurance plan is that we are all putting your money in and we are trusting that it will be medical treatment that is prescribed by doctors for that person and that we recognize and honor each other's choices about our own health care decisions. >> the institution does not seem to get a choice. thank you. >> thank you. that is all that we really have time for this evening. i'm sorry. i know how, you know, emotional the
why i see that as not really much -- >> might taxes pay for an awful lot of things that i opposed. [applause] >> just to be clear, the position is that the institution's money does not go toward the care that they object to, so that is why i see it as an appropriate or a well intentioned and well functioning agreement. the money goes from women's pockets to the insurance that they are part of. while there may be other folks who are a part of the same insurance plans to disagree,...
104
104
Oct 12, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 104
favorite 0
quote 0
national health services program, which is benefiting a .5 million poor moroccans, and financed by a tax on private companies aren't. pgd has also begun to reform public sector governance. you know to support the undertaking of micro economic reforms and the establishment of a strong corporate sector. so again the sequence they outserve starts with reform of public governance, improved accountability at the ministerial level, there at the public level they say would alleviate poverty, would have a positive effect on governance and would stimulate investment. the pgd is aware of the challenges it faces, and it faces many. it's also aware of the resistance to its efforts to promote accountability and transparency. and so far the pgd has i believe it's demonstrate it is sincere acting. trying to promote accountability and transparency. we don't know whether it will succeed. i think it's too early to tell in morocco. we can't judge its experiment based on nine months, too early to tell. so the governments of final battlefield as we move forward will lie in its effort to enact those organic l
national health services program, which is benefiting a .5 million poor moroccans, and financed by a tax on private companies aren't. pgd has also begun to reform public sector governance. you know to support the undertaking of micro economic reforms and the establishment of a strong corporate sector. so again the sequence they outserve starts with reform of public governance, improved accountability at the ministerial level, there at the public level they say would alleviate poverty, would...
122
122
Oct 12, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 122
favorite 0
quote 0
he is also has also said he is going to deal with tax loopholes and i'm not a tax expert but it seems to me they're an awful lot of those loopholes and that will help and again when we are only talking about essentially 1.4% of the entire problem, it seems it doable to fix it. you can't fix it in one year. you can fix it in four years for sure, so at least i'm trying to answer your question. now i can't just sit back and listen to some of this stuff and be told in a fact, you dov, you just don't know any facts. first of all one little fact. i really wonder whether mr. panetta, who talks about the smallest number of ships since 1950, sent that in a letter to your former boss, senator mccain, would really be happy to hear that his argument is ridiculous. it wasn't a republican he made that case. it was mr. panetta. number one. number two, the navy is going to be bigger to kasai funded the ships that are being built. it takes a few years to get them out to see. look at the pattern of naval spending and the number of ships over the next few years. the air force, rich was very careful to t
he is also has also said he is going to deal with tax loopholes and i'm not a tax expert but it seems to me they're an awful lot of those loopholes and that will help and again when we are only talking about essentially 1.4% of the entire problem, it seems it doable to fix it. you can't fix it in one year. you can fix it in four years for sure, so at least i'm trying to answer your question. now i can't just sit back and listen to some of this stuff and be told in a fact, you dov, you just...